Talk:Hellburners

Military history: Maritime / Dutch / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The big blockquote needs to be worked into the text - it may be a CopyR vio? A contemporary quote might be better. Anyway, I spotted this link from the Spanish Armada article. Good stuff, excellent title. How did they prepare these weapons?--Shtove 00:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the text as a whole can be downloaded free, a quote should be OK. --GwydionM 21:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Free downloading is not a license; lots of copyrighted text can be downloaded for free. If it's copyrighted (even implied) we can't use huge chunks of it like that. Isopropyl 17:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I guess it's not copyrighted. In any case we shouldn't simply be cutting and pasting from another source. Isopropyl 17:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is the point of an encyclopedia. The article as it stands is useless. Arzachel 21:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to do a rewrite, fine.--GwydionM 18:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose to remove the merge tag, on the assumption the recent expansion of the article has made it irrelevant.--MWAK (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You've done a good job expanding it.--GwydionM (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll remove the tag.--MWAK (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Units

Horrible mixture of metric and imperial units in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.132.31.173 (talk) 00:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hellburners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hellburners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080322012557/http://www.foliosociety.com/book/SAR/the-defeat-of-the-spanish-armada to http://www.foliosociety.com/book/SAR/the-defeat-of-the-spanish-armada

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]