Jump to content

Talk:Helicoverpa zea/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 14:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC) I'm happy to take on this interesting article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Table

[edit]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Ok; passes spot checks on plagiarism.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. lead: is too short. Please extend to summarize contents of article. Layout: ok; Weasel: ok; Fiction: n/a; Lists: n/a
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Doesn't matter for GA, but it would be desirable to format all refs in cite templates, right now some are and some aren't.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Quotes: n/a; facts: ok; blp: n/a
2c. it contains no original research. no sign of it
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. ok
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). ok
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. ok
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. no sign of any issues
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. all images from Commons
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. ok
7. Overall assessment. A concise and interesting article, properly written and cited.

Comments

[edit]