This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Why is this person notable any more than 1,000s of other people? Authoring a book per se should not make someone eligible for encyclopaedia inclusion... I don't know if I have heard of her or if she simply has a famous-sounding name. This is a seriously questionable inclusion in Wikipedia that was apparently initiated by her former or current students... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wherever this article came from, there is no doubt of Cronin's notability. I've started a Reception section, and even this small beginning is quite enough to show that Cronin has been involved in serious debate on the issues she raises, with major figures like Dawkins, Dennett, Gould and Maynard Smith attacking or defending her. The article was skimpy on both facts and citations -- it's already a little better in those regards -- but notability doesn't depend on what's in the article but what's out there in the world, and there's plenty more on Cronin to choose from. We'll make it into a GA one day... Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Reception section seems to be plonked together fairly randomly. The sub-section on 'Darwinism' talks about how Cronin was attacked by Camilla Power for "pontificating .. on how Darwinian theory should inform Blairite social policy". The context for quoting this attack has been completely left out. As it is, it seems like it's just in there just as a form of attack rather than an encyclopedic contribution to understanding Cronin's work. That she's mentioned in an article in an El Salvadorean newspaper as a citation for the percentage of population that are gay/lesbian seems... curiously uninteresting. This biography looks like it's been slapped together piecemeal rather than actually thought about. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}