Talk:Helen Magnus/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Never heard of Sanctuary, but my younger self religiously tuned in to SG1 for Amanda Tapping...
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Just a few changes needed
"The character is over a century and a half old, having been given her advanced longevity from injecting herself with vampire blood." -> should be "by injecting herself"
"This allowed each member unique abilities." -> Probably should be "granted each member"
"By the turn of the 20th century, her research with the abnormal population went into full swing and founded the Sanctuary Network." -> "and she founded..."
"during which she decided to use the embryo an bear her daughter" -> "use the embryo to bear her daughter"
"Despite this, Magnus believes her life energy might be in the shield buffer." -> I'm not really sure what this means.
- Just a few changes needed
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- MOS is fine.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations are grand.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is grand.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are used well. One is commons, one is fair-use with a solid rationale.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Just going to hold this until the 1A fixes are sorted, then it should be ready to pass.
- Pass or Fail:
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believed I have addressed all the issues. -- Matthew RD 16:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed the changes, and I'm passing this one. Well done! GRAPPLE X 21:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believed I have addressed all the issues. -- Matthew RD 16:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)