Talk:Helen Gahagan Douglas

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Communist? How so?

I gotta ask about this in the hope of expanding this article. Sweetfreek 18:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bunched up "edits"

This article has a huge problem with "bunched up edits" because of the large template. I don't know what can be done about it. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

I've NEVER heard her referred to as anything other than "Helen Gahagan Douglas." Even the article mostly refers to her as Gahagan Douglas or simply Douglas. I see no reason why it should be named "Helen Gahagan." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.220.25 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Propose move to "Helen Douglas".--Wehwalt (talk) 23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename !!!

This article needs to be renamed "Helen Gahagan Douglas" as this is the name the lady is best known by. I tried to do it already, but there's an empty article called Helen Gahagan Douglas that needs to be deleted or something first. Kenatipo (talk) 03:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Are you planning to improve the article, btw?--Wehwalt (talk) 03:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that, Wehwalt. You don't think the edits I've done so far have improved the article? Kenatipo (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, though, I didn't know anything about her except her name until the other day. Any further edits by me will be minor. Thanks again! Kenatipo (talk) 15:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are indeed an improvement, and thank you for the work. I've had her on my improvement list, but I haven't gotten around to doing much. I meant in terms of moving it towards GA/FA. Incidentally, I am hoping the article on the Senate race, which treats her very fairly and gives her biographer the last word, will appear main page on November 2.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Later life

The "Later life" section is unbelievably short! Today's featured article, United States Senate election in California, 1950, has information in the "Aftermath" section that at the very least should be copied into this article. IMDB mentions some Broadway appearances in the 1950s here. BTW, the election article says it was Manchester Boddy, not Gahagan, that coined the name "Tricky Dick". 86.41.26.32 (talk) 10:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Cranston quote

The quote as it is is too long. The second paragraph is in effect a biography. The article should say whatever needs to be said within the article, and not re-hash it in Senator Cranston's eulogy. Also, I don't appreciate the edit summary of "please be collaborative." It's what I'm trying to do, and put-downs like that don't help. Scolaire (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC) P.S. I just made some adjustments to the article.Mx96 12:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to have made you feel that way, Scolaire. And I understand your point of view. Of course eulogies are often biographical, and what I find striking about the paragraph in question is that it is filled with feeling and allows a reader, who might not have known the Congresswoman, to experience, somewhat viscerally, the effect she had on those who did. Does this make sense to you? Maybe there is another place for it…? Or maybe it can be edited. By the way, I think you are right about the “Appointments” paragraph; that probably should be shorter.(Mx96 talk) 03:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer both: to edit it and to put it in another place. I feel that a quote of that length, and at the tail end of the article, takes from the article rather than adds to it. However, you seem to be committed to the article for the long haul so I'm going to leave you to do as you think best. It wasn't actually me who suggested shortening "Appointments" but, having looked at it, I agree. Scolaire (talk) 10:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prior to reading the above note from you I just made some adjustments to the article. Hope you find them to be improvements. Mx96

At last I get it and I agree with you, Scolaire. I did not think in terms of the Later life and death paragraph ending the article. I have returned it to your version.Mx96 12:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Family

Her marriage to Melvyn Douglas produced two children. Surly worth a mention?Shipsview (talk) 13:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nixon cast votes contrary to national security?

The statement "It is not widely known, however, that the personal and political attacks between the opponents began when Douglas stated that Nixon had cast votes contrary to national security". was removed on the grounds that the stated source made no mention of it. Can this be verified from any other source? Shipsview (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kennedy supported Nixon in 1950?

The article states "Historian Stephen Ambrose and author Tom Wicker also note that Nixon's fellow Congressman John F. Kennedy donated to Nixon's campaign against Gahagan Douglas." There's no citation to help the critical reader locate where Ambrose and Wicker may have noted this. For Ambrose, I've located a reference in Nixon: The education of a politician, 1913-1962, pp. 210-211, which is also cited in United_States_Senate_election_in_California,_1950. Ewilen (talk) 14:54, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

good work, I added it. Rjensen (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helen Gahagan Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002102644/http://womenincongress.house.gov/member-profiles/profile.html?intID=61 to http://womenincongress.house.gov/member-profiles/profile.html?intID=61

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helen Gahagan Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Truman reelecton rally losangeles.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]