Talk:Heilpraktiker

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine

Chiropractic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

Better before?

Is the article as it currently stands an improvement over the stub that existed yesterday. I realise that it is a translation from Deutch, but it is so badly structured and referenced that the stub was better. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 16:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have twice returned this article to the stub that was in place before the German article "translation" was substituted for the stub. I make no comment about the quality of the translation work, but the resultant article does not meet tha standards of an enwiki article as the sourcing is very poor.

Please do not put that awful article back. Thanks. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 18:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked into this, just translated a bit of history, because the idea promoted in what I saw yesterday. that the whole profession and even the name is a Nazi invention, is plain wrong. More to come, and sources, but need a break. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]