Talk:Heckle and Jeckle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heckle and Jeckle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: United States Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

FYI

The section is full of unsourced trivial information that in list form and is not vital to the article existence. So it must be removed to help improve the article as a whole.

The caption is not redundant, it help to be descriptive to it's point while not causing the image to a mere garnish. Sarujo (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The section clearly shows that H&J retain relevance in popular culture. You may tag it for the time being, but deleting it entirely is not helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Rackinfrackin (talk • contribs) 19:36, 22 February 2012

No, all the section does is list trivia that makes bold claims without anything to back it up. When you are making an article, you must always verify everything with reliable sources. Otherwise it has no real place in the article. Lets not forget that it's in list form.

Also, Rackinfrackin when you post a comment, please take the time to sign your name with "~~~~". Sarujo (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

which bird?

Raven or magpies? I always though they were ravens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:CDCE:EA01:8699:2FB5 (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who's who?

Except for the last sentence, which lists voice actors (and doesn't belong in the section or the paragraph), the entire Who's Who section is original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]