Jump to content

Talk:Hebden, North Yorkshire/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 11:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review - On hold

[edit]

The article is readable and is reasonably referenced. However, I'm putting the article On Hold:

  • The WP:lead is intended to be an short introduction and summary of the article. It should not contain referenced information that does not appear elsewhere in the article; and should not contain in-line citations.
  • The article "fails" mostly on WP:Verify
  • The History section includes statements about planned village and Tofts that are unreferenced. Similarly, a cotton mill; remodelling of the village and conversion of back lane in high street; opening of railway line; Ibbotson Institute.
  • The Geography section is unreferenced apart from the last paragraph.
  • In the Landmarks section, the Dales Way and lead mining remains are unreferenced.
  • Possibly,the list of unreferenced statements is longer than this.Pyrotec (talk) 12:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    Article has been much improved since the initial review
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Good citations
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A Good Article