Talk:Heathian anarchism

This page was proposed for deletion by Eduen (talk · contribs) on 27 May 2009 with the comment:
i dont think this article meets the notability standards of wikipedia. it somehow wants to make of a literary image in a book a political theory. on top it only provides one reference to support it and it is the same book where we can find this literary image

Fair Use

Using less than one paragraph of a journal is well within "fair use" guidelines. The rest of the article I wrote myself (mostly) before it was deleted. PhilLiberty (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

The source page of the supposed copyright violation identifies itself as a Wikipedia mirror. —teb728 t c 01:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right. The page used to be here, but was deleted. Luckily it was saved on the Anarchopedia here[1].

The original source of the page was here, an old version of this article before it was moved to Spencer Heath and subsequently completely rewritten. It was contributed here by User:Hogeye on 4 February 2006. So if we consider this the attribution for GFDL purposes, we are no longer violating copyright. DHowell (talk) 04:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Notability

A simple google search establishes that Heathian anarchism is a much discussed topic. The General Notability challenge at the top of the page seem frivolous. There is no justification given on this discussion page of why it was put there. The article has references to Rothbard and MacCallum with links to journal articles by them. How long do we have to leave the frivolous notice at the top of the page? PhilLiberty (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]