Talk:Heath fritillary
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
To do list
[edit]- Conservation—Habitat management (from BC, n.d.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmanners (talk • contribs) 21:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Behavioral Ecology Student - Peer Review
[edit]Hello, below are some areas and points in the article that I believe need expansion. These are all open the debate, but I feel that they would strengthen the article.
- Renaming the Habits section to Behavior to match other well received butterfly articles.
- Adding information regarding behavior, which may include feeding, predator interaction, or breeding area selection.
- Creating a separate section for migration. Even though they are very sedentary, it might be useful to highlight that fact in a migration section, so it isn't lost in the habits.
Slzeng (talk) 19:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Peer Review - Heath Fritillary
[edit]Hi GRM,
Will keep adding points below. Some are, of course, suggestions and open to debate. Others may be points pertaining to FA/GA but why wait till we get there? Kill those points now, is how I feel. Hope these points are adequate to get you started!
AshLin (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Requires a copy-edit before you begin, especially in one instance of grammar/language.
- Lead - needs improvement vide lead paragraphs of Wikipedia:Lead_section.
- Description - are sexes alike? Are there any other spp it can be confused with?
- References - I would recommend "cite book", "cite web" and "cite journal" rather than using generic citation templates.
- Many of your references would be on Google Books. Good to link them - at best a limited preview will permit checking of references, at worst in snippet view, the veracity of the reference work can be checked, if not the exact facts being cited.
- Please add alt text to all images, including the taxobox one.
- Bring taxonomy up above the "Life cycle" section.
Rename "Citations" section as "Footnotes".- For a butterfly ranging from Europe to Japan the article is very, very Eurocentric. Will run afoul of adequacy of content standards.
- Looks thin on info to me. Have you done a search of Google Books & Google Scholar as yet?
- How about a toolserver dead-link check?
- Update taxobox to include IUCN status.
- Can you get someone to make you a distribution map?
- Is it considered a pest? Does it have any economic significance?
- Alternate names in English anmd other languages?
- There are 11 inter-wiki links. Try checking out those for additional information, images or just ideas.
- Image of egg needed.
File:P1160778 Melitaea athalia.jpg to appear as POTD
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:P1160778 Melitaea athalia.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 5, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-05-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Heath fritillary/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| ==Original Grading==
Very very good start much information is already filled out a few of the topics inside of the article are incomplete but they seem to be worked on soon. Low importance because its and individual species. -- IvanTortuga 02:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 21:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 20:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)