Talk:Healthy Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Re Notability: The following are the concluding sentences (not accessible online) of Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry Dukes MNG The Lancet - Vol. 360, Issue 9346, 23 November 2002, Pages 1682-1684

"...Medecins Sans Frontieres has committed itself strongly to action in this area, especially with respect to failure of the multinational industry to serve the needs of the developing world, either in terms of product development or pricing. (26,27) Another organisation, Health Action International (http://www.haiweb.org), has for a decade provided firm but thoughtful pressure on industry and governments and formulated well-deserved and constructive criticism of drug policy and practice. A small group known as Healthy Skepticism (http://www.healthyskepticism.org; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them."

At the time, Dukes was professor of pharmacotherapy at the University of Oslo and had recently retired after 25 years as editor of Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs and its associated annuals (major pharmacology textbook). RJ Clothier 02:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 June 2007 Healthy Skepticism's founder, Peter Mansfield, was honoured with a Medal of the Order of Australia for this work. The citation reads: "For service to medicine, particularly as an advocate for ethical pharmaceutical marketing practices and the quality use of medicines in Australia and in developing countries." http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/honour_roll/search.cfm?aus_award_id=1135023&search_type=simple&showInd=true RJ Clothier 01:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Healthy Skepticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106095923/http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0030451 to http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0030451

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]