Talk:Healing the deaf mute of Decapolis

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Bible High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deaf Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Healing the deaf mute of Decapolis is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

A good Article

Thanks for this article in Wikipedia. Came here from the Muteness article. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect statement?

I wonder if the last sentence in the article really refers to the healing of the deaf mute.

Commentator of Mark, Lamar Williamson, writes that this is the last unit in a series of miracles concerned with the identity of Jesus, as earlier confirmed by Apostle Peter's christological affirmation in Mark 8:29 where Peter exclaimed: "You are the Messiah". (Ref.: Lamar Williamson 1983 Mark ISBN 0-8042-3121-4 pages 138-140)

The problem is that Peter's confession to Jesus as the Messiah (Mark 8:29) follows both miracles, the healing of the deaf muted (Mark 7:31-37) and the healing of the blind man (Mark 8:22-26). This could be resolved by rewording the sentence: "... a series of miracles concerned with the identity of Jesus, as later confirmed by Apostle Peter's christological affirmation in Mark 8:29 ..." However, a correction like that would not solve the logical mistake in the statement, as the healing of the deaf mute cannot be "the last unit in a series of miracles concerned with the identity of Jesus" as it is followed by yet another miracle, i. e. the healing of the blind man, which has to be counted as the last unit in the series of miracles before the confession of Peter.

Possibly, Williamson's statement really referred to the healing of the blind man (Mark 8:22-26) and was inserted here by mistake. Unfortunately, I have no access to Williamson's commentary, so I can't confirm my musings. – Puzzled, ChoG (talk) 13:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]