Talk:Headlines (Friendship Never Ends)

Headlines (Friendship Never Ends) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 9, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Headlines (Friendship Never Ends) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Charts

it's time for someone to add charts it's already #26 on UK Radio Airplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicesoldier (talk • contribs) 17:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTH Happened to the charts?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.201.206 (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Friendship Never Ends"

It sounds to me as if they're referencing one of the lyrics from their breakout single, Wannabe. Leemorrison 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria's Secret product placement

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berserkerz Crit (talk • contribs) 13:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary speculative information

The article contains a paragraph of unsubstantiated speculative information:

"The marketing strategy of the single was quite questionable, releasing the single in a 2-phase-process (first digital, 2 weeks prior to the physical). A united and sudden release may have charted better. The fact that no B-sides or remixes were available on the single and that the Greatest Hits album was released at the same time may have lowered the single's chart possibilities."

It carries the tone of a fansite's pathetic attempt at justifying the single's poor chart performance, and stands outside Wiki's policy of containing only FACTUAL and SOURCED information, both of which are missing in this instance. Who else agrees that this paragrah should be deleted? Reqluce (talk) 01:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]