Jump to content

Talk:Head Like a Hole/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1111tomica (talk · contribs) 12:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually a quick fail. Reasons? A lot ! First and most important, lot of references are missing, the article is not complete, and the references are real mess. Sorry, but I am quick failing this. — Tomica1111Question Existing? 12:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: