Talk:Having Fun with Elvis on Stage

Having Fun with Elvis on Stage has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 10, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Elvis Presley (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley

A fact from Having Fun with Elvis on Stage appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Elvis Presley released a concert album that contains no music at all?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Having Fun with Elvis on Stage.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Having Fun with Elvis on Stage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Do we normally refer to Presley as "Elvis"? I would recommend using his surname as we do with most other individuals.
I don't think you need to link common words like "joke".
"that RCA did not own the rights to" -> "to which RCA did not own the rights"
"managed to make it up to" not neutral.
"and even as high as" ditto.

Otherwise a neat article. And interesting to boot. On hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. You still make reference to "Elvis". The Rambling Man (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, you still have "not own the rights to." The Rambling Man (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like these issues have now been resolved, so I'll pass the article. My briefest review for a while but I honestly found the article to be a decent state, interesting, reasonably well written and referenced, so nothing more to add for this review. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although the issues noted regarding the article's GA status were resolved long ago, for the sake of completeness, the answer to the first comment is "Yes" - while of course it's perfectly correct to refer to Elvis Presley by his surname on second reference, and I have to issue at all with that (so I'm not disputing any edits on this article), he was one of the rare cases (at least in western culture) where he was widely referenced as simply Elvis on second ref, and indeed was usually credited only as Elvis on record sleeves pretty much exclusively from 1960 onwards (it helps that his name was pretty much unique and unlikely to be mistaken for anyone else unless the topic might see him confused with musician Elvis Costello). The Beatles were treated similarly, with the members often referenced simply as John, Paul, George and Ringo in media about the group. 23skidoo (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]