Talk:Hasselwood Rock

This is the talk page for discussing Hasselwood Rock and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Scottish Islands Low‑importance

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Area

300m^2 seems like far too much for only 13m diameter... Beccaviola (talk) 12:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, Pi*r^2 would seem to give c.130 m^2 - I think that's right? I'll change it anyway. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

The photo claiming to show Hasselwood Rock is identical to the one shown in the Rockall article. Comparing to other photos, I believe it actually does show Rockall, so it's clearly misplaced here. Nasobema (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photo does indeed show Rockall; the clue is in the caption. Hasselwood Rock can only be depicted as an area of breaking ("white") water aspected to the right of Rockall which necessarily functions as the locater thereto.Gamelyn Chase (talk) 01:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elevation

This is given as 1m in the box but the text states that the skerry surface only rises 1m above low tide level so unless there is negligible tidal range, it will be submerged at high tide and likely at half tide which, according to elevations measured on the British mainland which use Ordnance datum would surely mean it had a negative elevation and not 1m. cheers Geopersona (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]