Talk:Haskovo

Bulgaria High‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Reason for the Turkish name

Because Haskovo has a significant Turkish minority, right? —Khoikhoi 15:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article must comply with the standard of the other Bulgarian City Articles, where only the Cyrillic name is given (e.g. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Varna, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Varna, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sofia, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dimitrovgrad%2C_Bulgaria). There is no reason to deviate from this template and introduce Turkish spellings (and do so in bold letters). --87.118.170.11 03:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is different, because Haskovo has a large Turkish minority. How about we put it in italics? BTW, you seem to be forgetting about all the Bulgarian city articles that have the Turkish name at the top. —Khoikhoi 03:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason for the Turkish name to have any more emphasis than the Bulgarian or the other ones. See the article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Edirne for comparison -- the Bulgarian and Greek names there are equally formatted, without putting emphasis on either one of them, or http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Istanbul where the official one is put in italics. Wikipedia articles should be just sources of relevant information, not a way to push an agenda. --87.118.170.11 09:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So you're satisfied with the current version of the article? —Khoikhoi 17:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Haskovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haskovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121213080413/http://www.haskovo.bg/en/ to http://www.haskovo.bg/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]