Talk:Hashem Al-Ghaili

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2023. The result of the discussion was Tainted mess.

Sources & expansion

Sources - Awards granted to the subject by websites owned or administrated BY the subject are not credible sources. - A link to Imgr is not a "source" for the claim that the subject's educational images have garnered a certain number of views - Links to Yahoo Finance and Business Insider articles that feature one of the subject's infographics is not a source for the claim that the subject's images have "garnered over one billion organic views" - statements by the subject about how many views/followers he has, re-printed as quotes in articles by other authors, are not credible sources for facts about the subject or his work - uncited claims in "Awards" section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.46.21.175 (talk) 11:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He's written his own page, hasn't he? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have found this BBC article about the man (which is NOT referenced in the Wikipedia article) but everything else I've found seems dubious at best. I was considering nominating the article for deletion but since I haven't really been active on the site for ages I was hoping someone else more familiar with the deletion process (hint, hint) might do it if necessary. I should probably recuse myself because I am admittedly annoyed by his fatuous articles which are shared on Facebook. ;) --Kooky (talk) 01:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm way late to this game, but it seems relevant to this discussion. So rather than starting a new topic, I'm just leaving this here. I've been editing pages on internet personalities, and I made a ton of updates to this page before coming to the Talk page. Probably should have checked here first. Anyways, I think I answered most of the concerns here.There are a lot of sources on his concept videos, so I relied on that a lot. Also some interviews he did with his university. Dax Kirk (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to deletion (if page is to retain, I recommend reclassifying it as science-fiction writer). Reason follows: for the topics Al-Ghaili is most controversial of, I found no published papers from him. He has at most a second-author microbiology paper in recent years. His youtube channel is entertainment at best, misinformation and hoax at worst. This article does not address these controversies, and may very likely mislead people into believing in his "science fiction". In this case, this page should be reclassified as science fiction writer, not *scientist*. K7magi (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"organic views"

What are "organic views"? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 20:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hashem Al-Ghaili. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an advertisement

This page reads like an advertisement and the person was recently featured in a rather pizzare head transplant startup company in the The New York Post

https://nypost.com/2024/05/22/us-news/scientists-announces-wild-plan-for-first-head-transplant/

Review required that is this page only updated by a PR company.. 188.67.181.254 (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]