Talk:Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania)
A fact from Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 21, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 22:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Well written
[edit]the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Change the link that says streamboat to steamboat.-Done
Fix sentence As was expected of them.-Done
Fix any other minor errors, such as needed commas or badly worded sentences.-Done
Verifiable with no original research
[edit]it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
it contains no original research
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
Broad in its coverage
[edit]it addresses the main aspects of the topic
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Neutral
[edit]it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Stable
[edit]it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate
[edit]images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Final Thoughts
[edit]As seen above, the article meets GA Criteria. Only thoughts are try to limit staccato (short) sentences (such as sentences with only 4-6 words), if possible. This creates smoother reading for the reader.
Also, I've made a few changes to the article (such as rewording sentences, etc.). Now the article looks good to go!
Overall
[edit]Article meets GA Guidelines
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402160134/http://r3levees.org/wiki/images/2/23/42079CV001A.pdf to http://www.r3levees.org/wiki/images/2/23/42079CV001A.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304040226/http://fishandboat.com/pafish/trout/trout_plan/troutplan2010.pdf to http://fishandboat.com/pafish/trout/trout_plan/troutplan2010.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)