This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

I deleted the following: "Unofficially it was admitted that, also counting underemployed people and people employed in state work creation schemes, the number is closer to 6.5 million. That number alone was expected to stifle domestic demand further, and to lead to another marked drop in consumer spending after 3 already dismal years in the retail industry. " I would like to see a source for the claim. However, for an "unofficial" (?) admission, I don't belive anybody can cite a valid source.--80.145.117.179 11:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==

Hartz-concept unconstitutional.

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,676708,00.html

FRG goverment got time till 01. january 2011 to change the laws accordingly to the court decision as can seen here:

http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/ls20100209_1bvl000109.html

the bundesverfassungsgericht has also given a catalogue to the government regarding the calculation of the hight of hartz iv

calculation can be seen here:

http://www.hartz4-plattform.de/images/RB-Umsetzung-BV_it-EVS-2003.pdf

the interesting part is on page 3 the calculation from 2003 - 2009 according to inflation.

the situation is until now not clear, it can happen, that the European Court of Justice is going to sentenced the FRG to recompense the withheld money (including interest) which would have a serious effect on the states budget.

on the other hand... the government is guilty of frauding the level of the minimal welfare-insurance.

to have an idea of the (small) numbers

would have payed to single adult, westgermany (childrens would get percentual less + if ppl lived together they got also less): 2003: 551 € 2004: 575 € 2005: 577 € 2006: 583 € 2007: 607 € 2008: 627 € 2009: 631 €

has been payed: since 1 .july 2009 359 Euro before that 345 Euros (there was a discrimination between west-germany and east germany)

2003 -> 206 * 12 = 2472 € missing w/o interest 2004 -> 230 * 12 = 2760 € missing w/o interest 2005 -> 232 * 12 = 2784 € 2006 -> 238 * 12 = 2856 € 2007 -> 262 * 12 = 3144 € 2008 -> 282 * 12 = 3384 € 2009 -> 6 * 286 = 1716 € + 6 * 272 = 1632 € = 3348 € sum w/o interest: 17400 € for a hypothetical person, who was unemployed from 2003 - 2009.

and last but not least payed "specialists" like that http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,576376,00.html

to think about the german stupidity.

~~ O_o ~~

Common Language

It is probably interesting that "Hartz IV" in common (written) language is also "HIV" or "H-IV". You can see this in nearly every comments area in newspapers in articles about Hartz-Laws. I also already heard it in spoken language (which can be confusing: people talking about work and all of a sudden they say "I got HIV".

But it gives a proper notion about how these laws are experienced: disease without cure. --88.69.192.149 (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hartz concept. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090703093612/http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/organisation/erledigungen_2009.html to http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/organisation/erledigungen_2009.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]