Talk:Harold Mertz

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harold Mertz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060315203437/http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/safety/protect_occupants/dummies/mertz_010702.html to http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/safety/protect_occupants/dummies/mertz_010702.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and sourcing

Hello wikipedians.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am still getting started on Wikipedia. However, this page appears to have no legitimate third-party sources. Should this even be included in Wikipedia? Coffee312 (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right. You'll notice from the page history that this page has been around, more or less unchallenged, since the early days of WP. That means that we should spend some effort trying to find better sources before nominating the page for deletion. You've made the first step with your "citation needed" tagging (although it might have been better to simply apply the {{unreferenced}} template).

I did a search to see if there's been much written about Mertz and his contributions to auto safety and did not immediately come up with any great references. More digging is probably required.

If, after some time has passed and nobody has come up with better references, you can feel justified in nominating the page for deletion (through Articles for deletion). — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]