Talk:Hardanger Line/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All references are in order.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Article is broad in its coverage and remains focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Article complies to WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All images comply to fair use requirements and are properly captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments: There were some minor issues, which I have fixed. I am satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]