Talk:Harald Kujat

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: Biography / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Gossip and smear

The section with his alleged Russian connections was has nothing but an allegation. Very encyclopedic Nicmart (talk) 01:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was my thinking as well. I don't really mind, I only check Wackypedia for the laughs anyway. 37.188.179.10 (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agree. Especially citing Bild/Welt is questionable. Both publications (Bild is boulevard press) are from Axel Springer corp. and should be treated as the same unreliable source. It is concerning that everyone questioning the official propaganda narrative is directly attacked as pro Russian. Kujat has clearly stated that the war is violating International Law, but also considers the security interests of other countries, rightfully so.

These unproven allegations are unworthy of an encyclopedia. 2405:6580:AC60:4400:AC19:EE9D:E79B:C678 (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is particularly non-serious to talk about "pro-russian statements" without even mention what statements it is. Let for gods sake the reader judge if it is pro-russian or not! As someone once retorted to such a remark, "If the devil says two plus two is four, I agree with him". Jan Wiklund (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]