Talk:Hanwha Group

Hanwha L&C was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 September 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Hanwha Group. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Hanwha CI.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Hanwha CI.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hanwha CI.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hanwha Securities of Korea, which fraudulently sold funds, should be held accountable for its mistakes and compensate the victims. Excerpted from The Reeves Press Story (250304) Under the guise that the risk of unilateral sale of subordinated and senior stocks, the core risk of the German Trianon Aegis 229 fund, is safe without explaining anything to customers Hanwha, which avoids responsibility for selling. There are 4,000 victims of this fund alone. When asked about customer questions about subordinated investments, he admitted to himself that he sold them without even the seller's knowledge, saying, "In fact, you can only know if you ask the company." The customer finally admitted that he/she would not have joined the fund if he/she had sold it without any explanation of the risk content of the legal unmanned fund and was explained that it was a risky fund (presence of recording). The court case also clearly stipulates that the fund seller has a duty to fully explain and protect the risk content of the fund so that the customer can fully understand it. How can a salesperson explain the risk to a customer when he or she doesn't know the risk of a subordinated and subordinated sale process? In addition, when asked why the risk rating and supplementary explanation are different, they answered that they don't know, that is, another clear evidence that they sold without looking at the fund's contents. Furthermore, I heard that they even instructed the salesperson to avoid customer contact. Fraud seller Hanwha Securities should compensate and punish Bind. 183.98.108.194 (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]