Talk:Hans von Storch

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

validation of climate model

It is stated that Storch et al is a validation of the climate model. I don't see it that way. He just used a climate model to generate date which he used to test the method of Mann. I propose to correct this piece of text.--MichaelSirks 19:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no sense to me. I removed the para. William M. Connolley 22:11:38, 2005-09-04 (UTC).

It was JH's. Sorry Josh William M. Connolley 22:14:05, 2005-09-04 (UTC).

Not that it matters (but just to prove I didn't make it up), the "10 editors" thing came from here (7th para). Rd232 23:28, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Thats an interesting article. I think I'd browsed it some time ago, but had obviously forgotten. William M. Connolley 09:02:36, 2005-09-05 (UTC).

Surprise, surprise

Don't forget to weigh in on Climate alarmism, doc. I already put your Storch quote there. --Uncle Ed 21:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error

The comments about "Science noting an error" is unsat. Science published a comment on the paper. And included a reply. And it did not "note" errors. The comment alleged them and made comments on interpretation. This is the normal process of science. And the citation to Real Climate (a blog, which Mann, who's been criticized by VS, runs) rather than to the Science comment itself is biased. I'm going to fix this bias. I won't bother with the edit war, though. I just hate that aspect of Wikipedia too much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.146.144 (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it, with slight changes. Adding a link is useful. Perhaps you could find the Sci thing directly? William M. Connolley 08:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequacy...

I've hunted down two papers referenced in the article with the following words:

The inadequacy of the MBH98 methodology for climate reconstructions was later independently confirmed in other publications [...]

While the papers uncover certain weaknesses, I think that's a bit too strong. It's also something not about von Storch, but about MBH. Maybe we should rewrite this as:

Other authors reported similar results to von Storch. [...]

Any comments? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Hans von Storch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hans von Storch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721015943/http://www.enseignement.polytechnique.fr/profs/mecanique/Thomas.Dubos/MEC580/2008/Leleu_VonStorch93.pdf to http://www.enseignement.polytechnique.fr/profs/mecanique/Thomas.Dubos/MEC580/2008/Leleu_VonStorch93.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs work

Parts of this article have been added by the notorious source faker, Polentarion/Polentario/Serten/Bakulan. It probably contains stuff which seems to be sourced to reliable sources but is really not, since the sources do not say what the article says. The German article has the same problem. I already removed in irrelevant paragraph where Storch is lauded by a denialist. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]