Jump to content

Talk:Hanna Cavinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Edge3 (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
Cavinder as a high school basketball player
Cavinder as a high school basketball player

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 20:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hanna Cavinder; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Seeking advice on use of the twins as a subject versus use of Cavinder as a subject in this article.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: My bad for not spotting that, although the information did come direct from their agent. @TonyTheTiger: This from Forbes (and not WP:FORBESCON) looks like a better source than the one you've swapped it for. That repeats the NYP info (which is therefore fine to include) but also has their own estimate of $1.7m. SmartSE (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse and TonyTheTiger: Both ALT1 and ALT2 exceed 200 characters. To help with this, I suggest replacing "dollars" with the dollar sign ($), among other fixes. Edge3 (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, would you like to submit images for this nomination? Both images are of high quality, and I especially like the photo with the two sisters. No guarantees that they will be used on the Main Page, but it doesn't hurt to try. Edge3 (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're still over 200 characters. I suggested "replacing "dollars" with the dollar sign ($), among other fixes." Would it be better to just use the NCAA abbreviation? Edge3 (talk) 03:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the fixes. I'm going to do a minor copyedit and restore the previous tick. ALT1c "... that twin sisters Haley and Hanna Cavinder made over $1 million in student athlete compensation the year after the National Collegiate Athletic Association legalized monetizing personality rights?" Edge3 (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
Passed. Vacant0 (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hanna Cavinder/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 08:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 08:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Initial comments

[edit]
  • There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 17.4% in similarity.
  • There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  • The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
  • No previous GA reviews.

General comments

[edit]

Final comments

[edit]

@TonyTheTiger: The article will be on hold for a week so that you can fix these issues that I've pointed out in the review. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vacant0, as I understand your review, the only changes that I see are needed is to replace dead URLs. Let me know if I am missing anything.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've noted everything that you should do above, this is to: add alt texts to images, shorten the short description to 40 or less characters, fix the 7 dead URLs, replace New York Post sources with reliable sources, and add a source for her height. Vacant0 (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've striked what has been completed so far. Once these two more issues get fixed, I'll promote the article to GA status. Vacant0 (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TonyTheTiger: It's been a week since this GA review has started and all issues related to GA criteria have been addressed. I'll promote the article to GA status now but I'd like to see alt texts added and the short desc shortened (less than 40 characters). Vacant0 (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hanna_Cavinder&oldid=1261168574"