Talk:Hamdog

A fact from Hamdog appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Dr. Nicholas Lang of the University of Arkansas advised against ever consuming a hamdog at any point in one's lifetime?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/August.

Wikipedia

Hamdog was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 25, 2010). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hamdog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 22:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This article lacks almost every element in a good article. There are almost zero illustrations, there is no detail in the article and does not ever focus in at a single point on an topic. Below are a complete list of issues:
- No illustrations
- Article never focuses in on a concept
- Article has many short basic paragraphs
- Misuse of capital letters
- Lacks references
- Lacks complete sentences

I would recommend re-reading the criteria for good article status and re-submitting at a later time. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 22:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamdog.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Hamdog.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hamdog.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflating two different foods

This article conflated two different foods with the same name. At first it talks about the Australian version, but everything after that is in reference to the southern US version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.95.56.66 (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that we should split into two articles. They're largely different besides for their names, and one is a copyrighted and branded product.

Bruhpedia (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitive factoid

In this article, the anecdote about Dr. Nicholas Lang, who advises against ever consuming a hamdog, is mentioned twice for unknown reasons... Once is more than enough (and since his opinion is just hyperbole, IMO it deserves to be omitted entirely) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.82.7 (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]