Talk:Hajong people

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

India: Meghalaya / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Meghalaya.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in October 2017.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In May this article was marked as needing references and its notability was questioned. I have since added content as has another user. How can we remove the notices saying it needs references etc.? Thanks Virginia C. Phillips (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that there is enough references in the article and problems have been fixed, remove the tags. Please note that ANY editor in good standing can just as easily readd the tags.--The wikifyer's corner 22:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unpublished references

I'm concerned about the use of the following unpublished references:

Ahmad, S., A. Kim, S. Kim, and M. Sangma. (2005). The Hajong of Bangladesh: A sociolinguistic survey. Unpublished manuscript.
Kinny, E. and I. Zeliang. (2005). A Sociolinguistic survey among the Hajong of India. Unpublished manuscript.

Per reliable source, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources..."

Are there reasons these should be exceptions?--SPhilbrick T</> 16:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

British Era sources

Per consensus and general policy here in Wikipedia, we do not use British Raj era sources when it comes to ethnic groups. So such changes will be removed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Chaipau (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: Not to mention, the British sources do not provide any thing of importance other than to introduce scientific racism in an ethnic article, that is discouraged in Wikipedia. I'm going to add a bit for the migration part sourced from a journal present already [1]. Please see if you can contribute in it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: That looks like a good source, but I can access only part of it. Is it available via Wikipedia library? Besides, Bareh (a well know scholar) is also probably a good source. Chaipau (talk) 13:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: No only the excerpts. Don't know whether available in Wikipedia library. Kindly use Bareh if needed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: I don't think Nath (1989) supports the remaining content in that sentence after this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove the remainder if you're confident Nath doesn't support it. Skimming his book, I thought it more or less said so (maybe not on the exact page cited, but within a page or two), but it isn't my area of expertise. Worldbruce (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I've included a range of pages, since that would better represent the content. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]