Talk:Hagryphus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skrepnick image

I removed the image by Mike Skrepnick. First, I don't believe it has a usable copyright tag. Second, it was originally published as a restoration of Nomingia, not Hagryphus--news sites merely co-opted it.Dinoguy2 03:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dinoguy, the image is published as a press-release illustration here: [1]. Press release images are explicitly OK for fair-use republication. I re-added this image before I saw that you had earlier removed it; on further reflection I believe it's totally reasonable to use this pic here. Plus, it's an amazing image.

I've also emailed the author of the image for explicit permission to use it here. Pending his reply, we should keep it up. Killdevil 16:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't realize pess release images were usable, but looking more closely at that tag I think you're right (I'd assumed it was a standard "big red C" copyight tag, oops!). I agree, keep it up, but I'm goig to put it on Nomingia as well, since that's what it was originally intended to represent.Dinoguy2 17:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the caption to indicate that this is not an actual restoration of Hagryphus, though the press release stated that it was. I'd not seen it associated with Nomingia.--Nar'eth 20:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manus linking

Right now, manus in these dinosaur articles do not have anywhere to link to. To me it at best can point to a definition on Wikidictionary, but if someone thinks an encyclopedia article can be made for Manus (hand) or Manus (dinosaur), then go ahead and create it. Please do not link to the disambigation page at Manus. --- Jagged 11:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hagryphus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130828042919/http://www.geology.utah.gov/online/c/c-93/gseprocl.htm to http://geology.utah.gov/online/c/c-93/gseprocl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]