Jump to content

Talk:Hagia Sophia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 02:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Criteria

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    At least one explicit citation needed tag, however, a large percentage of the article is currently unsourced. This includes quotations and statistics. This article is simply not ready for a GA nomination. Please seek peer review or contact the relevant WikiProjects for assistance. Viriditas (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Images are not distributed evenly throughout the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Quick-fail due to egregious sourcing problem. Please re-nominate after adding sources for quotations and statistics. I have not checked for potential copyright infringements. Viriditas (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]