Talk:Hadronyche formidabilis

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hadronyche formidabilis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Taxon?

What's the taxon on this species? I could not find anything unanimous. --Sarefo 02:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm

Article says, "Thankfully, the northern funnel-web as well as the Sydney funnel-web only can be found in Australia." I suppose this is NPOV. I can't relate to "thankfully", though, because I live in Sydney! For a mammothly arachnaphobic dude like me, "aggressive, fast and deadly", mean my irrational fear is augmented by a credible threat.

Actually, I was relieved by the word "thankfully", because it showed someone else understood my fear. There's more than five million of us sharing space with these dark little darlings, I guess we're winning atm. Also, the spiders here are nothing compared to the snakes, or the crocodiles, and we have sharks too.

Normally none of these creatures are hard to deal with, it just gets a little tricky when there's more than one and you're half asleep.

Oh well, got to get back to work at the Australian Tourism Commission. Alastair Haines 08:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My immediate reaction to the article was the same objection to "thankfully". I've changed it now. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 02:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To check

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hadronyche formidabilis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211163126/http://usq.edu.au/spider/find/spiders/207.htm to http://www.usq.edu.au/spider/find/spiders/207.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]