Talk:HM Advocate v Salmond

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

merge discussion (Result:Delete)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article was nominated for merging with Alex Salmond on 25 January 2019. The result of the discussion was delete this page.

Reason: Not enough content for a full article. Should this just be a section? RhinosF1 (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I'd suggest keeping this all within the Salmond article. It may be -- indeed probably will be -- enough for a separate article in due course, but it could be months before we can say anything more. Bondegezou (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the article, it seems like most of the content is already there so feel free to change to a proposed deletion as duplicating content. RhinosF1 (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed even as a redirect: anyone interested would search for Alex Salmond, not HM Advocate..., so deletion is preferable. An encyclopedia shouldn't have articles on trials that can/in all likelihood can be summarised adequately in the main article on the accused. EddieHugh (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed to an AfD discussion RhinosF1 (talk) 07:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HM Advocate v Salmond

RhinosF1 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Identification

I would add that the Crown Office have tweeted a few days ago that there is a court order preventing the publication of the names of the alleged victims in this case. PatGallacher (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They also tweeted two hours ago that this court order still stands. PatGallacher (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]