Talk:HMS Warrior (1905)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 23:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   prose: (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. Description section is messy. Suggest Sub dividing it up into General characteristics, Propulsion and Armament

• Broke out Armament section like the Achilles article.

2. The German shells caused large fires to break out and heavy flooding although her engines continued running for long enough to allow her to withdraw to the west. Suggest - The German shells caused large fires to break out which caused heavy flooding. Although her engines continued running long enough to allow her to withdraw to the west.

• Reworded it, see how it works for you.

3. (5,000 m) from Wiesbaden. Need to expand the brackets - (5,000 m from Wiesbaden)

• No, the parentheses only apply to the converted distance.

4. Warrior was hit by at least fifteen 28-centimetre (11 in) and six 15-centimetre (5.9 in) shells,[10], Needs a comma - Warrior was hit, by at least fifteen 28-centimetre (11 in) and six 15-centimetre (5.9 in) shells,[10],

• Deleted the comma after the cite.

5. HMS Warspite when its steering jammed and caused that ship to make two complete circles within sight of much of the High Seas Fleet.[9] Suggest - HMS Warspite when its steering jammed and caused the Warspite to make two complete circles within sight of much of the High Seas Fleet

• Good idea. Thanks for the reviews.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Great work once again Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)