Talk:HMS Vengeance (1899)

HMS Vengeance (1899) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

HMS Vengeance (1899) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 16, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Vengeance (1899)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in good shape. A few comments from me:

length differs between body and infobox
- Fixed
do you use normal or deep load displacement in the infobox? I thought it was normal?
- I usually use loaded if I only use one - figure that's more useful, as it's what the ship displaced in service
draft/draught
- Fixed
crew differs between body and infobox
- Fixed
ihp differs between body and infobox
- Fixed
where were the TT located?
- Added
"at a given weight" wouldn't it be thickness rather than weight?
- Fixed
perhaps link the main guns in the body?
- Good idea
bulkheads in the infobox are big to small, which is a bit weird, decks same
- Yeah, that is odd - I didn't go over the box closely when I rewrote the article, as you might have guessed.
did she have turrets or gun houses? body and infobox don't match for thickness either
- Corrected both
" Hong Kong in 1903–1904"?
- Fixed
"with the merchant ship SS Biter"
- Fixed
Orkanie is sometimes "Orkanie" and at another point just Orkanie. I think once you've identified it as the Orkanie battery, you could get away without the quotes
- Works for me.
"~~with~~while Vengeance and three"?
- Think I had meant to structure that as "...with V and 3 BBs providing covering fire" and forgot halfway through ;)
"She also took part" probably best to specify Vengeance here.
- Good idea
Kirithia should be Krithia
- Good catch
en route to Dover
- Fixed
I don't think File:Canopus class diagrams Brasseys 1906.jpg needs the 70y licence as we have PD-1923 (and we don't have an author date of death for it anyway).
- Added the author - it was originally published in the UK, so we do need the 70y PMA license.
other images look fine.

That's me done, placing on hold. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 13:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]