Talk:HMS Thunderer (1872)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll do this shortly. JAGUAR 11:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- "and gained a reputation as a unlucky ship for several years afterward" - an unlucky ship
- "The ship was assigned to the Portsmouth Reserve in January 1888 before beginning a major modernization" - modernisation
- "The Devastation-class ships had a complete wrought iron waterline armour belt that was 12 inches thick" - convert to mertic
- Done in the armament section.
- No dead links
- " of wrought iron armour at the muzzle" - muzzle is a dab link
- "The muzzle-loading gun had been double-loaded following a misfire" - misfire is a dab link
- True, but the last entry is the actual definition that I'm referring to.
Too bad this isn't HMS Thunder Child!! On hold. JAGUAR 14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Isn't it though! Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sadly it's the closest thing we can get to Thunder Child. I actually listened to it whilst reviewing this! Anyway, with all of the issues out of the way, this can be promoted JAGUAR 21:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)