Talk:HMS Thruster (1917)

HMS Thruster (1917) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 9, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Thruster (1917)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Indy beetle (talk · contribs) 06:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, passing. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

As the destroyer escorted the prizes back to Harwich, they were attacked by torpedo but suffered no hits. Presumably by a German U-boat?
- Yes. A good spot. I have amended the text as it is mentioned in the source. simongraham (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
returned to the Flanders coast for what would one of the last patrols of the war. For what would be one of the last patrols? Also was the sailing to Flanders the patrol, or did the patrol occur afterwards?
- Yes. I have amended this to clarify and added a bit more about the sinking of UB-54. simongraham (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
but withdrew before the outbreak of hostilities between Italy and the United Kingdom. Might be good to specify that that wasn't until 1940.
- Good thought. I have added that, with a reference. simongraham (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig's tool returns no meaningful similarities with other work.

@Indy beetle: Thank you for your comments. I think all the changes have been made. simongraham (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: