Talk:HMS Swallow (1744)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 21:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 13:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get to this soon! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Very solid lede. Short, but doesn't need to be longer with a short article like this. Design, construction, and service are all written with clarity and I can't find anything that stands out as an MOS violation.

Sourcing:

High quality sources, consistently formatted with SFNs and a bibliography. Primary sources are used sparingly and in conjunction with other sources.

Spot check

All the Winfield 2007 cites check out. With archive.org being down, it's rather difficult to check many of these sources, but I was able to use Google Books previews to confirm the two Riley 2000 cites and Hepper 2023.

Breadth

~~8 meters~~

Seriously though, good coverage. I'm surprised there was this much info about such an obscure ship!

Neutral

Indeed. Seems like a fairly reasoned coverage of the ship's history.

Stable

Yep. Nominator is the only editor, I'd sure hope so.

Imaged

Both images are good. I would add alt-text, but that isn't a requirement. It looks like everything is shipshape here! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.