Talk:HMS Sceptre (P215)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 07:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I should do this together with Seadog. I have a few comments:

my comment about uboat.net applies here too
say in the lead how many patrols she did
make the same changes to the Design and description section as suggested at Seadog's GAN
why was there such a delay between her being laid and down and launched?
- TBH, I really don't know. I could try to dig more for info if you feel it is important.
for anti-submarine patrol link anti-submarine warfare
say where Port HHZ was
suggest dropping ||2 to get German battleship Scharnhorst, then use ||2 with Tirpitz
in Nnorthern waters
succeeded in inflicting heavy damage and what weapon was used for this? gun or torpedoes?
generally, I reckon you can go for u-boat rather than U-boat, as long as you link it at first mention
for Lippe, link the shipwrecks list, I don't think that is too easter eggy
Lippe was broken up the next day? that seems unlikely if she was beached, perhaps she just broke up?
"targets with underwater with mines" not sure what you want to say here
link the shipwrecks list for Hochheimer, Vela and UJ 1111
- I've done it for Baldur as well.
The sentence beginning "After training for operations with X-class midget submarines..." covers a three month period. Do we know when she got back to Scotland?
for scrap link ship breaking, if the earlier one was just breaking up
in the table "but broken up the following day" same comment as earlier
same comment about the source of the schematic
Santoni isn't used, it isn't clear why it is here, but if it has anything of use, perhaps put it into a Further reading section?
Earwig is all green, just some phrases from uboat.net

Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day L293D, this has been on hold for a month, so I'm going to fail this one unless there is some action shortly. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There, I think I've got all the issues addressed. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using acceptable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:32, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]