Talk:HMS Salmon (1916)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 22:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. This looks in pretty good order, just a few comments:

The beam dimension is inconsistent between text and infobox
- Thank you. I also noticed a discrepancy between the reported draught and that in the source which I also fixed.
The mm conversion for the 3 single QF also differs between text and infobox
- Template fixed.
I think when discussing the renaming of the ship, be more explicit that she was taking the name Sable from her sister ship, and the irony of it being the one she collided with. As it is presently worded, it feels the connection isn't strong enough particularly given the wording of the lead.
- I have expanded this so hopefully it makes it more clear, but I feel that this anecdote justifies a better writer than me.
Image tags OK
No dupe links

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 22:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Thank you for your excellent review. I have made the changes. I feel that there is a potential DYK in the Sable and Salmon saga but do not feel confident that I could create a good hook. If you feel it would be interesting, please feel free to take this on. simongraham (talk) 19:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]