Talk:HMS Saladin (1919)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 16:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"he S class was"
- Fixed.
Very nit-picky, but the article says the ship was "handed over" which doesn't necessarily mean sold
- Amended.

"Mark V 21-inch torpedo to be carried aft"
- The source does not say. The implication is that they were carried in the torpedo tubes aft and that is carried over here.

Choose whether you capitalise "Armistice" or not, currently you use both
- Capitalised as per MOS:MILTERMS
"independent operator under HMS Victory" what does this mean, considering Victory doesn't really...go anywhere?
- The elderly ship of the line had been refloated by then and much the restoration carried out but was by no means operational. I have added some text to clarify that.
"would be sent to join"
- Amended.
What role did Saladin have in the sinking of U-207?
- I read the sources to say that the destroyer was one of the escorts that between them sank the submarine but the crew's actual contribution was probably small.
Believe it should be "ON 18", etc, rather than "ON. 18" "ON.25", "HX. 154"
- Amended and linked.
Perhaps a few more words on where these convoys are going, because it isn't made clear
- Clarified.
Link Falmouth
- Added.

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Thank you for looking at this. I believe all the changes have been made. simongraham (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simongraham: Passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Your article output is almost unmatched! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]