Talk:HMS Resistance (1861)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Criteria

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

  • A few duplicate links: muzzle velocity, bulkhead, wrought iron
• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

  • No citation errors noted.
• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  No edit wars etc.:

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:

  • Appropriate tags used for images.
• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Only issue noted is with duplicate links. Otherwise, all good. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

All fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Passed as GA. Zawed (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)