Talk:HMS Penn (1916)

HMS Penn (1916) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 8, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Penn (1916)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image appropriately licensed
Suggest that you delete the gun model from the infobox
- Deleted.
Link stem, full load, yard number
- Linked.
Where were the torpedo mounts located?
- Added.
How many depth charges?
- Added.
Link Friedman and Newbold in the bibliography--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked.

@Sturmvogel 66: Thank you for taking a look at this. I believe the amendments I have completed should address your comments. simongraham (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you are correct.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]