Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 05:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I will take this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, Zawed. I look forward to your comments. simongraham (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Lead
- The M class were an improvement on the preceding L class...: suggest either "The M class ships were an improvement on those of the preceding L class..."
- Added.
- Should the hyphen be present on all instances of "M class" & "L class"?
- I have tried to follow Template:Sclass in using the hyphen for the adjectival form and without for the noun.
Design and development
- ...the greater performance was appreciated...: suggest, for greater specificity, "the greater performance of the M-class was appreciated".
- Changed.
- a length of 265 ft (80.8 m) : the conversion in "m" doesn't match what is in the infobox
- Fixed the infobox so it is consistent.
- Referring to speed, those in the infobox go to the first decimal point.
- Similarly fixed.
- Mystic had a main armament ...: Mystic?
- Oops. I updated the sentence from the GA review of the other destroyer but forgot to change the name. Fixed.
Construction and career
- By the following month, the routine developed...: suggest "a routine"
- Changed.
- ...unsuccessful search for the German minelaying...: suggest "a German"
- Changed.
Other stuff
- Sources look reliable, no spotchecks done as nominator has excellent history
- Monograph 33 is listed as a source but doesn't seem to be cited
- Good spot. I have added the relevant sentence.
- No dupe links
- Image tags OK.
Looks in fine shape, only minor issues found. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Zawed: Thank you for another very helpful review. I believe I have made all the changes. Please tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Your changes look fine, so am passing as GA now as I believe the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)