Talk:HMS Minotaur (1906)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The prose says 779 officers and men, but the infobox says 802 - which is the correct number?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Everything else looks to be in order, just the discrepancy between the crew size numbers. Good work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Fixed the crew size; copy-paste error from Defense.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured it was something like that. Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)