Talk:HMS Marvel (1915)

HMS Marvel (1915) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 29, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

}

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Marvel (1915)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 07:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 07:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, sorry for the length of time it has taken for me to come back to this. I really lost track of time here. Anyhow, this is in reasonable shape, just minor quibbles.

No problem. Thank you for spending the time on this.

Lead

...rescued all by four of...: I think that the "by" should be "but"?
- Good spot.

Design and development

The design was to achieve a speed of 36 knots...: suggest rephrasing to "The design was intended to reach a top speed of 36 knots", this to eliminate the double usage of "achieve" in this sentence.
- Amended.
Some of the dimensions in this section goes to two decimal places but the corresponding dimensions in the infobox go to one decimal place. This creates some inconsistencies in the respective dimensions due to the rounding up/down.
- Made consistent.
296 long tons...: a sentence shouldn't start with a number unless written out.
- Fixed.

Construction and career

"The destroyer" is used quite a bit, particularly in the 2nd paragraph.
- Reworded.
the vessel was sold to be Ward of Hayle: don't think the "be" should be there?
- Fixed.

Other stuff

Sources look to be good quality
Image tags OK
Dupe links: forecastle, High Seas Fleet
- Removed.

Again, Simongraham, apologies for the delay in getting to this. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Please do not feel you need to apologise; I appreciate your diligence. I believe the amends have been made. simongraham (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The changes look fine, so I am passing this as a good article now, as I consider that it meets the relevant criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]