Talk:HMS Hotspur (H01)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   prose: (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. but in increased to 146 in wartime. Suggest - but this was increased to 146 in wartime.

• Indeed.

2. edicts. Suggest a link for this

• Changed to policies.

3. British and Australian troops from the beaches. Is that the Greek beaches?

• Yes, just like I said earlier in the sentence

4. in June after working up. Suggest - in June after her refit

• Linked it instead.

5. ship's Hedgehog? What's the ships headhog?

• See the previous paragraph.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)]

Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)