Talk:HMS Duncan (D99)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) 06:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Ping.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

• Publisher missing for FN 17.
• "was transferred back" --> "returned"?

Both done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)