Talk:HMS Dreadnought (1875)

HMS Dreadnought (1875) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Dreadnought (1875)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photos are good to go
2 dupe links
Add commissioning year to the infobox
There's a Harv error in the reference list.

Not much to ding you on. Parsecboy (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can there be a harv error when I don't use harv format? The only thing that I've used that's not bog-standard is the format for the Brown book since I've only got the epub version. Can you tell me what the issue is, since I don't have the script for the harv checks installed? Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it's from the {{Winfield}} ref - you'll have to copy it in by hand instead of using the template. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps it's a meaningless error message because it's invisible to the reader.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A fair point. No doubt someone would raise an objection at ACR/FAC, but I doubt you have aspirations of taking this article there. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]