Talk:HMS Dragon (D35)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am confused
[edit]Can someone please confirm this for me....
The ship, built in Scotland, Linked to a City in wales - yet has a motto "We yield but to St George" - the patron saint of England. - I think HMS dragons a little confused about her nationality! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.68.51.2 (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
"HMS Dragon slipped into the water from BVT's shipyard at Govan, Glasgow, with an 18m Welsh Dragon on its bow."[1], that's a quote from a BBC News article which partially confirms your statement. I'm not quite sure where the confusion lies regarding HMS Dragon's national affiliations; she seems to be quintessentially, and purposefully, a symbol of British unity.
Welsh Dragon.... "We yield but to St George" - that does describe 'the union' for a lot of Welsh people I guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.68.51.2 (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- The motto goes (I think) with the ship name, like the ship's badge - there have been several previous Dragon's which have served with the Royal Navy. So the motto relates to the story of George and the Dragon, but given the decommissioning and scrapping of HMS Cardiff it was obviously decided that the name was also sufficiently Welsh for this particular HMS Dragon to be asscoiated with Cardiff. 12:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok - We were given the impression here that there was going to be another 'Welsh Warship', (AKA HMS cardiff) - Shame that the closest thing we'll get is a ship who tells us to Yeald to St. George. Oh well. When Wales is independant we'll get our own Warship again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.68.51.44 (talk) 15:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
For the benefit of those who haven't read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#How to use article talk pages, here is the policy:
- Keep on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal.
I've already removed some nationalist vandalism from this talk page. Thanks for your co-operation. Shem (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Battle honours
[edit]I removed these from the article infobox, another editor has restored them. I may have been wrong in removing them, so have asked for clarification at WT:SHIP. Mjroots (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- It like some of the other stuff talked about jsut above, badge, motto and battlehonours all go with the name, not the individual ship. David Underdown (talk) 14:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- For British ships it's more practical to have all the ship name's battle honours on the ship name's disambig page (i.e. HMS Dragon), whilst repeating just the battle honours that that particular ship has earned on just the article page. This is because it may confuse readers who are not familiar with the commonwealth system, or may in fact not be all that familiar with ships at all, that is the point of an encyclopaedia after all. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- As the battle honours include their dates, readers ought not to be confused about which, if any, have been earned by the current ship. David Biddulph (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- The confusion is that they have to work it out, and the original reason why this was brought up is evidence of this. If people have to stop and ask why, and then wait for a commonwealth editor to inform them, then it's obvious that that particular system isn't working. Ryan4314 (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- As the battle honours include their dates, readers ought not to be confused about which, if any, have been earned by the current ship. David Biddulph (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- For British ships it's more practical to have all the ship name's battle honours on the ship name's disambig page (i.e. HMS Dragon), whilst repeating just the battle honours that that particular ship has earned on just the article page. This is because it may confuse readers who are not familiar with the commonwealth system, or may in fact not be all that familiar with ships at all, that is the point of an encyclopaedia after all. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]There's a nice stern view on http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk if you search for 45153101.jpg and a good one with the dragon painted at 45153123.jpg 86.31.135.251 (talk) 11:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Dragon mural on bow
[edit]I think the dragon mural on the bow of the ship should be mentioned in the article as it's unusual for a modern-day RN ship to have and is a notable characteristic of HMS Dragon. It was added whilst under construction and many thought it would go once in active service, but they've maintained it. Argovian (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on HMS Dragon (D35). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071031074413/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk:80/server/show/nav.2227 to http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/server/show/nav.2227
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Dragon (D35). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141028221659/http://navy-matters.beedall.com/paams.htm to http://navy-matters.beedall.com/paams.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on HMS Dragon (D35). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531070301/http://82.146.41.123/index/D9.shtml to http://82.146.41.123/index/D9.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141028213846/http://www.wartsila.com/fi/references/HMS-Daring to http://www.wartsila.com/fi/references/HMS-Daring
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.newsdeskmedia.com/files/Global-Force-2013.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313123057/http://www.raytheon.co.uk/newsroom/news/press_release_08032006.pdf to http://www.raytheon.co.uk/news_room/news/press_release_08032006.pdf
- Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120905172853/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3624A3FC-1A13-42AE-B5C6-CF8F730807C3/0/desider_52_Sept2012InternetU.pdf to http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3624A3FC-1A13-42AE-B5C6-CF8F730807C3/0/desider_52_Sept2012InternetU.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2468784.0.Thousands_line_the_Clyde_to_see_HMS_Dragon_roar_for_first_time.php - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629162200/http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/operations-and-support/surface-fleet/future-ships/air-defence-destroyer-type-45/dragon/news/worshipful-company-of-plaisterers-visit/index.htm to http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/operations-and-support/surface-fleet/future-ships/air-defence-destroyer-type-45/dragon/news/worshipful-company-of-plaisterers-visit/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
The Merlin & anti-ship missiles
[edit]Why can't the Merlin carry anti-ship missiles? And what would it take to convert them so they can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.57 (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages