Jump to content

Talk:HMS Diamond (H22)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    The article maintains a consistently good style and layout.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    References are well used.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The article covers the major aspect and is well focused.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article does not seem to be subject to edit warring.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    The sole image used is in the infobox and is within the public domain.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Very informative. Harrison49 (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]